blog #10: Katrina

It is interesting to me that when people talk about hurricane Katrina, they automatically think of New Orleans, and the aftermath of the levees breaking. When you think about it the hurricane itself really did not do much damage to New Orleans at all. Katrina did its most damage to Alabama and Mississippi. But why is that aspect not talked about in the media? Why do those two states get the shaft on this horrific event?

The people of Alabama and Mississippi also had a devastating encounter during this time, if not worse than those who were affected in New Orleans. Obviously, New Orleans had a huge outrage because of the levees breaking. With the shocking event of the levees breaking, a lot of racism was brought out through this tragedy. Most of it was the racism was brought to surface because of the media, though not all claims were true. As everyone knows the media definitely likes to stretch the truth or emphasize on things that the public wants to see. Society likes to see tragedy, heartbreak, and drama. It is what gets their attention.

Now back to talking about the New Orleans levees, was Katrina truly a natural disaster? I would definitely say yes. The fact that the hurricane was coming and where it came is uncontrollable. The levee itself was known to only be able to hold against a level 3 hurricane. So with these facts everyone knew what was coming to New Orleans. The levee breaking is also another fact that could not be controlled. The state of Louisiana should have had a levee that could withstand a stronger hurricane than a level three.

            When you look at the geography of Louisiana it just so happens that the more impoverished people of New Orleans live in an area that is the furthest below sea level. Such as the ninth ward. This part of the state is known for holding poorer families. Louisiana has a population of 32% African American, while the national percentage for African Americans is 13.6. This population percentage is very high for the black community in the state of Louisiana. So to look at the amount of African American people who were affected by the levees breaking cannot really be a factor of the incident. There are many people who believe that the Levees breaking were not an accident. The race card is thrown into play because of the areas that the water covered.

            Here is a piece of a report written about the wetland problem that has been occurring in Louisiana for a few years now. It was not just the levees that were a problem.

“Hurricane Katrina’s disastrous flooding of the Gulf Coast confirmed three decades of warnings by scientists. Most of New Orleans is below sea level, and South Louisiana’s coastal wetlands, which once helped buffer the city from giant storms, have been disappearing at a spectacularly swift pace. Now some researchers are calling for restoration of wetlands and barrier islands to help protect New Orleans the next time a hurricane strikes.

An average of 34 square miles of South Louisiana land, mostly marsh, has disappeared each year for the past five decades, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). As much as 80% of the nation’s coastal wetland loss in this time occurred in Louisiana. From 1932 to 2000, the state lost 1,900 square miles of land to the Gulf of Mexico.

By 2050, if nothing is done to stop this process, the state could lose another 700 square miles, and one-third of 1930s coastal Louisiana will have vanished. Importantly, New Orleans and surrounding areas will become ever more vulnerable to future storms. “New Orleans can’t be restored unless we also address coastal and wetland restoration too,” says Craig E. Colten, a geographer at Louisiana State University (LSU).”

This report helps prove the point that the disaster occurring in New Orleans was not a man made tragedy but a true natural disaster. 

Media coverage on Katrina

The discussion we had earlier this semester about the food industry made me think a little in comparison to the media, specifically with Katrina coverage. Given the question ‘Do we really have choices when it comes to food? Or are the foods we eat chosen for us and brought to the stores for us to buy?’  This makes me think the same of the Media. When the media covered Katrina only certain aspects were shown to the public on what issues were occurring at the time. But who chooses what is televised in the News? How do they choose? These are questions I have always wondered. Every News station will have a slightly different interpretation of the story they cover, but for the most part every station will be covering the same stories.

And I find it interesting that in class we discuss how certain terrible events were not covered or even talked about with Katrina referring to racial events; though the people who were affected by these instances are predominately liberal. And the media itself is primarily controlled by the liberal population. So how does that work? Wouldn’t it make sense that people who support the Democratic Party would want to share these kinds of horrific events with the public? The same events that the liberal party is always accusing the republicans for doing (hinting at racism).

I feel that many people want change in the world; though it is not always talked about upfront because there is no plan to do so. I think that if there was a clear way to change society and make it so that everyone could be equal it would happen. But my question is how you someone or a group of people actually go about doing so?

Again going back to my first statemtent of comparing the food industry to the media. The media just as teh food industry has a lot of power against the public. They choose what we watch, and what we are informed on. For instance there are many killings, rapes, and missing children everyday. But not all of these instances are covered through the media. How are things like this prioritized? How is one childs missing story chosen over another? Who decides what is shown? Who decides what is important and what is not?

Splitting up New Orleans

Today in class we stared to discuss the locations people in New Orleans lived. The number of people who lived there, and the race of the people. Specifically we talked about the ninth ward, which is predominately African American, and holds mostly impoverished families. Many were discussing the question of why it is that the location was chosen for the lower class citizens, who happen to be predominately black, of New Orleans to be at a lower elevation; thus causing more flooding to their areas as opposed to the predominately white neighborhoods.

                For me this is not a question or blame against race. This is simply an issue of money. When you think of who had built the homes, and sold them, that businessman was purely looking at this as a business deal. How can he make the most money? Someone who is rich for example, will spend more money for a home that is larger, and in a great location. So when you look at the geography of New Orleans, the area in which the ninth ward falls is not as attractive. This is because it is closer to the levees, and not on higher ground. Someone who is in the reality business easily recognizes this so he will build nicer houses on higher ground (better location), and will then be able to sell the house for more money as opposed to a house which is built in a more worse off location.

                This is just like when anyone is looking for a house, they will look at the location of the area. Building that surround it, if there are good schools, parks, and making sure that their house would not be in danger at all when it comes to any kind of natural disasters. These factors are what make the deciding factors of what the homes are worth.

So again I do not see this as a race issue, but as a money issue. And yes, when you look at who has money and who doesn’t, it factors out to be that there is a higher number of African Americans in the ninth ward than white but, the percentage of African Americans who live in New Orleans alone is 60.2%, while there is only 33% of Caucasian (U.S. Census). So I feel with these facts you cannot compare as much. I do not see that a business man would turn a deal away from anyone, no matter the race, if they had the money to do so. The man selling the home just wants to make money and will do whatever he can to make the most he can. Even though this reminds me a little of how our food industry acts the same way about money comapred to the person it may affect, it is still a business, though it may be wrong, that is the thought process of a businessman.

Blog #6: Placement of Products (continued)

Here is a photo I forgot to add to my original blog of product placement. right after halloween this display was set up at our local pullman walmart. It was toward the back of the store, but still very hard to miss. Obviously promoting coke products in an interesting way to get peoples attention.

Blog #8: CIW/ La Compesina workers

                After reading and doing research about both the CIW and the La via Compesina, I realized that the main differences between the two organizations is that the La Via Compesina is more international based and the CIW is directly related to the workers Florida. With the CIW organization they try to make the voices heard specifically for the immigrant workers, mostly at farms, who are in Florida. These workers typically are not paid minimum wage as the average American in this country. For example a tomato worker will be paid per bucket they fill. Not paid by hourly wage, but by the amount of crop they pick. This could be seen as a commission standpoint which could be very beneficial to one person, but then could be detrimental to another. This easily causes very low wages for these workers.

                The CIW tries to make sure that fair wages are given to such workers, even if they are illegal. They feel that it is a human right not a citizen’s right to be paid fairly. The CIW also looks to keeping labor laws in effect for these workers. Harsh working conditions are usually found in situations such as these. The workers are usually immigrants who do not have a place to stay while they work for the farmer. There is usually someone who will set them up with work along with living conditions and food, for them to be able to stay in the U.S. These are normally not good conditions. The CIW tries very hard in keeping conditions such as these in control.

                A large argument found against the CIW would be the fact that illegal’s should not be here in the U.S. anyway. Therefore, these people should not be concerned, and media should not care for the working conditions they are given. If they do not like the conditions they are given then they should go back to where they came from.

                I do not exactly know where I stand on this argument. I am definitely against having illegals here in the U.S. If someone wants to come live in the U.S. then they can easily become a citizen and go through the necessary processes. I have seen many issues with having illegal’s here in the U.S. Many taxpayers have to spend money on these noncitizens; Medical bills, education, etc. This causes great issues and concern for the taxpayers of our country.        

                Having said that, I also do not feel that human right should be discarded because of this. I understand after reading Patel that these workers are easily “stuck” in situations such as these. A form of slavery can be built around the workers. Once involved in a situation where they were promised many things, and then just not given the promises, the workers cannot get out of their situation. They end up in debt, and just cannot afford to leave because of the lack of money they receive from their bosses.

                Another issue with the illegal workers is that they usually will do the hard labor, particularly farm work, that many Americans would never do. This video shows a little understanding on this issue.  Steven Colbert went in front of the Congressional subcommittee with an opening statement that reflected on the illegal farm workers in the U.S.

The La Via Compesina on the other hand is not so specific. They are an organization that brings together millions of peasants, small and medium-size farmers, landless people women farmers, indigenous people, migrants and agricultural workers from around the world. They want to give a voice to all farmers who are small or just do not have the ability to speak for themselves. This group is looked at now that they have become so largely known. Just as a union is built, they have come together to help each other receive proper treatment and payment for their work.



Locations that are affected by La Via Compesina



Blog #9: Who to blame for Katrina Chaos

I was born in New Orleans and therefore I have many friends and family who live there. All of whom I have talked to have different perspectives on the events that occurred. Everyone has a different viewpoint on who was responsible for the terrible events, and different viewpoints on the actions that should have been taken. The video that we had watched in class was a good reflection on the thoughts throughout the community. The video showed many community members and officials who were involved in the catastrophic events, and they were able to give their personal thoughts on what really happened. Everyone who was interviewed all had a unique viewpoint on the events.

                 Some people blame President Bush, for not coming to New Orleans sooner, and not helping to his full extent. Some look towards the Governors and the mayor for not preparing the community for this disaster. I feel that anyway you look at this event there would be no way around any kind of disaster. Even if the state was prepared to the fullest, there would always be something that is out of everyone hands that cannot be controlled.

(To the left os a photo of President Bush, and Governor Blanco. Who had tried to blame Bush just before, for not catering to her demands for help from the federal government. Though, Bush on the other hand does not recognize any of these claims.)           

On that note, I do feel that there is blame to be had in the overall situation. The problem that arose with Katrina was simply the lack of preparation. To me this falls in the hands of the state. After watching the video in class it seems that many officials were looking at one another wondering who would truly be in charge to take control of such an event. I feel that governor Blanco was the one who should have stepped up. The governor was told well before the hurricane that everyone must be evacuated. She knew how big the hurricane was going to be, though nothing happened until days after the hurricane hit. It is primarily the responsibility of the state to take control, if they are unable then they may choose to  ask the federal government for help. The federal government is not allowed to step into a situation such as this, until the state asks otherwise. This was a huge mistake made by the Governor.

                The video was interesting because Governor Blanco seemed to contradict herself. She tried to blame everyone around her for the lack of attention toward this event. Even though legally she is to blame. After talking to friends and family from New Orleans, reading the book Floodlines by Jordan Flaherty, I have come to the conclusion that the true problem was from the lack of attention beforehand. Why did it take so long for the National Guard to come to the south? Where were all the buses to take all the people out of New Orleans? Why did it take a week after the levees to break for Mayor Ray Nagin to come on to the radio crying; and wondering why things are so bad?

                Well, I know the answer to these questions. PREPARATION! Which was not there. I think that the mayor’s radio interview had to be fake in a way. I am sure after seeing his home city destroyed and the hurt of all the people affected, that he was affected by it.  I also think that he used that interview to try and block any possible negative attention he might get by showing how much he cares, and trying to deflect the responsibility to someone else. I may have fell for something like this, but you have to look at the timeline of when this radio interview had fallen. It was too late in my eyes.

                The notice was out for all residents of New Orleans to leave. The government should have known that not everyone would leave. As seen in the video we watched in class, reasons people did not leave were the fact that they did not have the financial means to leave, no car, no money, and/or  no place to go after they had left. Others did not leave simply because they felt as though it would be a waste of time and money to leave. Some felt that they could survive this storm, just as they did with Hurricane Betsy.

                There should have been preparations for helping these people out, and to somewhere safe. There is no excuse to be made by these officials. Governor Blanco had the overall say of what would happen, and nothing did.

Extra Credit Blog: Food Inc.

I agree with the statement made by Richard Lobb. That, “In a way, we’re not producing chickens, we’re producing food.” This statement seems highly accurate to me being that farmers are raising these chicken for the purpose of humans to eat. These chickens are round up, and bred solely for this purpose. These chickens have their lives planned out for them, and have no other reason for being alive, besides to fulfill this purpose.

The video below is a news story covering the film “King Corn”. This film goes behind the scenes to show the true colors of what is in our food, and how corn affects it. It goes deeper into knowing how our corn is processed and where it is put.

After receiving more knowledge about the processing of our food, I can easily agree with this statement that “We want to pay the cheapest price for our food. We don’t understand that it comes at a price.” This is simply explaining that in our society, we want to be able to pay as little as possible on our food. Though in order to pay at such a cheap rate, we have to the dilute the quality of the food. This includes the process in which our food is harvested, such as the labor, pesticides used, etc. These events take away from our nutrition and health needs.

A tradition that my family holds dear is for Christmas Eve dinner. We always make our homemade enchiladas for dinner every year. This is a tradition that has been going on since my mother was a little girl. It first started by my great grandfather who came from Guatemala. Like the farmer’s who had their tradition of saving their seeds every year, to have my tradition taken away would be very upsetting. Traditions become close to the heart. It creates a unique bond between those involved. Traditions, normally, reflect good memories the families.  

Michael Pollan thinks that consumers should know what is really in the food that they purchase. The California Farm Bureau sends off a different message with their products. Many goods have symbols of farms, large fields, sunshine, etc. This all reflects on happiness, sense of being natural and healthy. Though, this is not always an accurate reflection. As talked about previously our food has many added ingredients and treatments that we are unaware of.

Overall, the video gave me a good insight on today's world of farming. Comparing the perceived vs. the reality of what we are being provided in our grocery stores. The video reveals the true identity of this market.

Blog #7: Dark Side of Bananas

Bananas grow in tropical climates such as Southeast Asia, and Central America. They grow on tall stalks that can reach up to 25ft in height and in bulks surrounding the heart of the banana tree. The trip a banana takes starting from the tree it grows on, all the way to the consumer can withhold harsh conditions.

Specifically looking at the labor conditions these workers go through to get that banana to the consumer ripe and tasty. The banana industry is almost entirely controlled by three large fruit companies: Chiquita, Dole, and Del Monte. These companies rely on smaller farms to produce their crops. The demand for a large amount of this fruit at a low cost, blemish free is very high. Companies like these have gone to extremes to make this kind of production happen.

First, Did you know?:

Crates of these bananas were set up at the Aldi Huxley Exhibition at Design MAI in Berlin. This art exhibit called “The Dark Side of Bananas” was meant to show off the harshness that this fruit provides. The true colors of this industry are invisible to the public, so it is important to inform those about this situation. Even though most of the people who see this exhibit cannot make a change by themselves, it is a step in the right direction. The more the public is aware of the situation, the easier it is for the media to take hold of the story, and eventually attack the situation at the root; which is the larger companies. And what better way to start this domino effect than showing a statement visually. I personally think that statements like these are interpreted to its fullest in ways like this.

This short video shows the process of the harvest, inspection and the pesticides used before shipment. Sorry there is no audio…

This video reveals the intensity of this job. The bananas are very heavy. Even while working with the harsh chemicals, no gloves or masks are provided. The common pesticide used for these bananas has been known to cause great heath issues such as sterility for men.

            I believe that if the public did know more about situations like these, there would be changes. As I said before even if the message only gets to one person at a time, it is still an impact. If people become aware of these situations little, by little it will eventually come to a positive conclusion. I do not think that the consumers are using deniability, but the fact that they just are not aware. I also believe that even if people are aware, or when they become aware they will most-likely still buy the product. Though, they will do so more conservatively, and will always remember what they learned about in every purchase.

Blog #6: Placement of Products

List #1: Items promoted to me within the grocery store

·         Fruits and Veggies

·         Candy

·         Pepsi

·         Tostitos Cheese dip

·         Bakery treats

·         Deli meals

·         Oreos, twinkies, little debbies, etc.

·        

List #2: Items promoted to those who may have a disability, or children who are shorter

·         Colorful cereals full of sugar

·         Candy

·         Bakery treats

·         Healthy Choices

The items I notices right away in the grocery store were normally stacked high, colorful, large signs,  and would be displayed in a way to be a focal point among all other items present around it. Pepsi, and Coke products are constantly being put on display throughout the stores. This is because it is a highly demanded product to the consumer. It is one that many are familiar with and easily relate to. The Cheese dip is displayed on its own rack that sticks out from the normal racks in the chip aisle. This rack makes it a focal point to attract you to buy this dip when you buy our chips. There thinking is, ‘why not add to the experience of your chips.’ This way if you had been planning on buying some kind of dip, the store makes it easily accessible to you to buy the specific product. This also gives the consumer the idea that they should buy this product because it is popular, meaning that it is something you should have.

        Items such as bakery treats, the deli, and fruits and veggies also have their own unique displays. The way in which an item is displayed attracts the consumer to it. These items are not your regular needed, everyday items. So these items are set up to attract the consumer into buying them. This all plays into the science that goes behind marketing. Such as the fact that the milk, which is the most frequent item bought in the store, is placed in the back so the consumer must walk through the whole store; causing them to pass other items for impulse buys. These items are not displayed in long rows against the shelves, but they are on “rounders” and square tables. This unusual display catches the eye of the consumer with its different set up from the regular aisles. These tables make it so the consumer is capable to walk around them and see more of the same items in different varieties.

        Some may have a different and unique way of looking at the store from the ordinary consumer such as children, those with disabilities or even someone who has a special diet.  For Children, marketers place the items that they would be attracted to on the lower shelves (eye level). These will tend to be more colorful and may have some kind of character that they can easily recognize. This is most common in the cereal aisles. The cereal itself will be colorful and contain a lot of sugar. Everything a child could want.

        I believe that the main contributor to this madness is marketing. Obviously every brand in the store has their own marketing team, along with the store itself. There are many factors that play into what choices the consumer will buy. Though, it is my personal opinion that the most popular items/ companies and who ever throws in the most money to place their products wins in the competition of what the consumer will buy when they go to the store. Therefore, these underplayed dictatorships are the ones who truly have the upper hand in what is purchased.

Blog #4: Social Justice in Saipan

Watch this video to get an overview of the working conditions presented in Saipan:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7543104430091001172&q=garme#

Saipan is the largest in a chain of fourteen islands in the Pacific Ocean known as the U.S. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The workers are brought to the island from China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Bangladesh and other Asian countries. These workers, mostly women, must sign to agree to pay off thousands of dollars worth in recruitment fees. Most of these workers come to the island for work to help pay off debt their family may contain back home.

            “These workers have often been enticed by promises of high wages and quality employment into signing contracts demanding that they waive basic rights like the right to join unions, to date, and attend religious services. Instead, these workers find themselves trapped in 12-hour work days that run seven days a week, earning the minimum wage of $3.05 an hour, toiling incessantly to repay the recruitment fees that range from $2000 to $7000, all while laboring in working conditions condemned by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).(1) What sets this prototypical sweatshop environment apart from the many operating around the world, is that it is both operating on U.S. soil and currently being successfully challenged in three separate lawsuits.”  

This passage comes from an article that was written by the Cultural Survival Group,
http://www.culturalsurvival.org/ourpublications/csq/article/saipan-sweatshops-challenged.

 In 2002 the settlement was approved for 26 retailers including, “Abercrombie & Fitch, Brooks Brothers, Brylane L.P., Calvin Klein Inc., Cutter & Buck Inc., Donna Karan International, Dress Barn, Gap Inc. (Banana Republic, Old Navy), Gymboree Corp., J.C. Penney Company Inc., J. Crew Group Inc, Jones Apparel Group, Lane Bryant Inc., The Limited Inc., Liz Claiborne Inc., May Department Stores Company, Nordstrom Inc., Oshkosh B'Gosh Inc., Phillips-Van Heusen, Polo Ralph Lauren, Sears Roebuck and Company, Talbots Inc., Target Corp. (Target, Mervyn's, Marshall Fields, Dayton-Hudson), Tommy Hilfiger USA Inc., Warnaco Inc. and Woolrich, Inc.” Only one refused to sign the contract, which was Levi’s. They were awarded $20 million for the settlement, which is the largest amount given to a international human rights case.

This is another article that explains the case written by the L.A. Times, http://articles.latimes.com/2002/sep/27/business/fi-saipan27.

The working conditions that were held on this island are horrendous. These workers were being treated as slaves in that respect. Even their living conditions were unacceptable. Especially when you take inconsideration that these companies who are supplying these services are multi millionaires/ billionaire. The amount of funding should not be a question. The conditions for these workers are better than they were before, but there is always room for improvement.

Blog #3: Alcatraz

The movement that occurred on the Alcatraz Island was one that helped change the lives of many Native Americans. In 1969 the takeover of Alcatraz fueling the rise of modern Native American activism. This movement sprung awareness to the American public, along with our nation’s government about the unfair American Indian rights issues. This movement brought many American Indians together to fight for their rights. It brought hope and empowerment to those affected by the unfair ruling toward our native people.  On the website http://www.pbs.org/itvs/alcatrazisnotanisland/activism.html, Russell Means proclaims that,

“Before AIM [American Indian Movement], Indians were dispirited, defeated and culturally dissolving. People were ashamed to be Indian. You didn't see the young people wearing braids or chokers or ribbon shirts in those days. Hell, I didn't wear 'em. People didn't Sun Dance, they didn't sweat, and they were losing their languages. Then there was that spark at Alcatraz, and we took off. Man, we took a ride across this country. We put Indians and Indian rights smack dab in the middle of the public consciousness for the first time since the so-called Indian Wars.... [AIM] laid the groundwork for the next stage in regaining our sovereignty and self-determination as nation, and I'm proud to have been a part of that.”

This statement proves how scared this group of people became. Showing how tired of fighting against everyone that they would give up their culture and beliefs in order to try and get by without harassment by others opposing them. The saying ‘if you can’t beat them, join them’ comes into effect in this case.

                Before this class I was not aware of this movement. I feel that while in middle/ high school you are not taught about many movements. I think the reason being not because they do not care, or do not want to talk about these types of issues, but because there is not enough time allotted in school to cover issues like these when more simple items are critical to learn such as math and literature. At a younger age, such as elementary school, I do not think that a child could comprehend the complexity of these types of issues. This is why we have higher education, to be able to take classes that can broaden ones perspective from their everyday lives. Issues like these are not brought up outside of school in everyday life because they are in the past. I feel that most discussion I have on a daily basis is not in bringing up past events, but talking about what is happening now, and worrying about the future. So with an event like this, unless you were personally affected by this, it would not be something you would really talk about. I am glad to be in this class though and learn about these events that I was not aware of before.

                 This movement was great for our country to learn more about the culture of American Indians. Like I stated previously many people will tend to focus on their own lives, and seclude themselves from the world around them; especially if they are not aware of the instance. The affects of Alcatraz made it possible to get the word out to the public to be aware of their culture and become more accepting of them as people. Like many issues surrounding culture barriers, I feel that the real problem influenced is the misunderstanding, or lack of knowledge people have towards each other.  Obviously, there are people who are aware of issues, and do not care to help in anyway. But that thought does not reflect the rest of the population.

Blog Extra Credit: "The New Face of Homelessness"

The effects of homelessness take an extreme toll on everyone in the family who is involved. The article "The New Face of Homelessness" by Kelly Cobiella focuses these effects on the children of these families. The children she interviews are all in school. School itself, for a child, is an obstacle to overcome. Especially in middle and high school the average child is constantly teased, and gains many insecurities about themselves. This alone can easily cause depression, which affects their school work and who they become friends with.

            This fact does not include any hardships that these children face in their home life. To add this factor of homelessness, this will just add to the schooling of these children. Breanna Martin, a 13-year-old claimed “I have like no clothes anymore because I lost them all. So basically I wear whatever I can find. I’m wearing right now my grandpa’s shirt and my grandma’s pants.” For a middle school student, image and social status is all that is thought about. They constantly judge and are judged throughout the day. This creates insecurities that can psychologically affect children at the deepest level. These children who already start in poverty; no clothes and no money does not help matters at the least.

           

Another issue that was not mentioned as much is in this article is hunger. With the little to no income these families produce, food is going to be their number one priority to spend their money on.  Many who are involved in this situation are not eating as well as they need to. It is good that public schools try to help in this matter by providing free lunches for those who did not bring one or do not have money. Though these lunches are normally just a simple P.B.J.

Blog #2: U.S. Youth and Resistance

For this blog I read the article “8 Reasons Young Americans Don't Fight Back: How the US Crushed Youth Resistance”, by Bruce E. Levine, found on this website: (http://www.alternet.org/vision/151850/8_reasons_young_americans_don%27t_fight_back_–_how_the_us_crushed_youth_resistance?page=entire).  After reading this article I cannot say that I agree with everything that Levine had stated. Although many of his statements are true, I do not feel that they can be correlated to this idea that today’s youth is not able, or wanting to resist. For some points, not all of the facts of each situation are stated, so a valid analysis cannot be met. In this blog I will be addressing the points that the author has written about and give my own opinion on the issue.

I do not agree with Levine when he states that “The nature of most classrooms, regardless of the subject matter, socializes students to be passive and directed by others, to follow orders, to take seriously the rewards and punishments of authorities, to pretend to care about things they don’t care about, and that they are impotent to affect their situation.”. I feel that what is taught in school is not to follow orders, but to be respectful of their elders, and their peers. What is taught in school should not take away from your own opinion about different topics. Even though you need to have respect for those around, you should be able to come to your own conclusions on a subject matter. Schools teach respect, and facts, along with debate. For most schools, their mission is to teach facts to their students. They try hard not to add their own personal opinions into the subject matter, but instead to teach the different sides or ideas of subjects baring multiple theories. Though, this is not always the case in schools. Not all educators are able to keep their own beliefs away from the subjects. This can greatly affect the students in their own ideas about life and other subjects. Children’s minds are easily molded. So to have an authority figure tell them one thing (that they strongly believe in) is true, it is only logical that the student would right away believe in or even change their mind about the subject.

The author also talks about how surveillance takes away from one’s wants to rebel. At one point he refers to the surveillance starting at a young age with parents watching their children’s activities closely. I think that this has increased over time because it has followed the change in technology and availability to the younger generations. With these increased changes parents have to work harder to keep their children safe and pure for as long as possible. Society has changed in this sense very rapidly over the years. For instance the media’s idea of sexuality and what is accepted may not be the same for most parents with their children.

Another point made was Levine’s idea that the reasoning of this lessening resistance upon our newer generations is because of society’s outlook on being “followers” rather than “leaders” I feel is not the complete truth. I can see how some of that reasoning would reflect on some of the choices that one would make. Though, I also feel a big part of this decreasing need for resistance is simply because the need is not there. If there is no conflict, there is nothing to face.

The Article “Is American Youth Too Coddled To Revolt?” by Nikki Arena is one I think can easily blend both my opinion and that of Bruce Levine. I think this article is true to the social trends of our youth and has good explanations for them; Seen on this website: http://goodmenproject.com/on-occupywallstreet/is-american-youth-too-coddled-to-revolt/.

The author mentioned that people in other countries such as Egypt and Iran have recently rebelled to the extent of being killed to get there point across. These actions are taken because they are trying to fight for freedom. But here in America we already have freedom. Many countries and peoples want freedom as well so of course they will give up everything in their power for it. America has done so many times. If America had lost its freedom, I am positive that every one of us would go out and fight for it. That kind of liberty is definitely something that people would die for. And is something that many still do today in America, the only difference is that we have created a system so that our young are not subject to pay the price for it. Resistance should not be a characteristic of a person, yet only an emotion when it is truly needed; you should not set out to find something to resist just because you as a human have the power to do so.

Blog #1: Globalization effects on consumption

I am majoring in Apparel Design. I am learning more and more everyday about the Industry/ world I will be living going down my career path. I had taken a trip to New York this past spring to visit several companies in the industry. Out of the 16 companies, only 2 of them made all of their product “in House". Out of the whole state of NY, there are probably only 5 companies who produce product “in house”. Before the trip I took, I did not realize how many companies chose to go the route of having their products made abroad. Most all of whom I talked to would do their production in China. Not only is this a social issue considering the labor laws that they implement, but this is also disconcerting "on a personal level" with the amount of jobs that are lost because of the overseas production.

In N.Y.C. I learned more about what these companies actually accomplish here in the states while all the production/labor is abroad. The companies lose the importance of hiring seamstresses, Patternmakers, textile dyers, etc. I feel that most of the technical skills I am learning in my classes are important, and one would need to know them in order to become successful in this business. Though, with the lowered cost for production overseas, companies are losing the need to hire people for these skills. The limitations on what jobs are available to me once I graduate are astounding; and this is not based on my personal skill level that I can/ cannot provide, but rather on the opportunities that are taken from American citizens in the workforce. The need for mass production is the main cause for these actions.

The video we watched shows this in action throughout companies of all industries and statures. Nike was a company that I had always thought I would love to be a part of.  After the video, and visiting several companies in NY, I realized that I would like to be a part of a company who refuses to work outside of the country; to have everything done “in house” and let our country become dependent upon itself.


But what would happen to our relationship with china if most to all production stopped. Does America have the resources and the man labor to produce the amount of product these companies are expecting. Is our relationship with China strictly related to the amount of work we give them? How would this change affect us globally. We, America, already take so much from China as it is. You could say we abuse our power against theirs.